Short answer: the LP-E6NH is a Canon model rated 2130mAh, and its strengths are reliable recognition, steady discharge and fit across the whole body range. LP-E6+ is not a Canon designation — it is how third parties label an enhanced version, and its strengths are price and, on some products, extras such as a USB-C charging port. Which to buy depends on the body first: for the EOS R5, R6, R6 Mark II, R7 and 5D Mark IV, where recognition matters, prefer the Canon LP-E6NH; for older bodies such as the 5D Mark II, 6D and 60D, a third-party pack is perfectly adequate in a backup slot; and for the EOS R5 Mark II neither is the right first choice — look at the LP-E6P.
Setting “LP-E6+” beside “LP-E6NH” is a slight mismatch to begin with — one is a model, the other a category label. But the real question is clear: what exactly does the extra money buy? Here it is across four dimensions.
Four dimensions — capacity, discharge, recognition, price
The first two decide how well it works; the last two decide how much trouble it saves. Taking them one at a time.
Dimension one: capacity, where the rating is not the usable number
The LP-E6NH’s 2130mAh is Canon’s published rating, measured under stated conditions. Third-party LP-E6+ packs commonly claim 2200-2400mAh, which looks better on paper, but two caveats apply:
- Test conditions differ: a capacity measured at a low 0.2C discharge shrinks noticeably under real high load.
- Shell volume is a physical limit: the LP-E6 shell is a fixed size and cell energy density gains are limited, so a higher rating deserves more scrutiny, not less.
In practice, the runtime gap between a well-made LP-E6+ and an LP-E6NH is usually within 10%, which is rarely the deciding factor.
Dimension two: discharge stability, the real dividing line
Capacity decides how long it runs; discharge decides whether it fails at the worst moment. Canon’s advantage here is clear, and it comes from cell consistency and protection-board strategy.
To keep costs down, third-party packs often mix cells from multiple batches, which widens the resistance distribution. In use that shows up as:
- burst speed dropping early during high-speed sequences;
- the camera shutting down during long-exposure noise reduction;
- a cliff-edge drop in the cold;
- the gauge jumping from three bars straight to power-off.
These are more visible in older bodies, because their gauging algorithms are coarser and they tolerate voltage fluctuation less well.
Dimension three: recognition, which decides whether you get a percentage
Canon bodies recognize Canon packs as a closed loop, reading model, percentage and cycle information. Third-party packs depend on their own identification chip, and whether it works depends on that chip’s design and the body’s firmware version.
| Item | LP-E6NH (Canon) | LP-E6+ (third-party enhanced) |
|---|---|---|
| Model status | Canon’s third-generation general-purpose model, before the LP-E6P | Non-official label; standards differ between brands |
| Rated capacity | 2130mAh / 7.2V | Often 2200-2400mAh, with wide measured variation |
| Gauge | Works across the range; newer bodies show a percentage | Depends on the chip; older bodies may show bars only |
| Discharge stability | Good consistency, steadier voltage under heavy load | Notable variation between brands and batches |
| USB-C charging port | None | On some models, allowing a power bank top-up |
| Price bracket | Canon pricing | Clearly lower; common in the budget bracket |
The row worth studying is the USB-C port. That is the genuine third-party differentiator, and for many buyers the only reason to choose an LP-E6+: Canon’s LP-E6NH and the LP-E6P both lack a charging port, so on a long trip away from a desk, third parties are the only way to escape the dock.
Dimension four: price bracket, and what the gap buys
The gap between the two is typically tens of yuan up to around a hundred. What that buys is a predictable discharge curve, stable recognition, and less diagnostic work when something goes wrong. For anyone who treats the camera as a tool and cannot redo a shoot, that is money well spent.
Conversely, if the pack is only a backup, the work is mostly stills, and the body is a low-draw model like the 6D, the marginal benefit of the premium is limited and a third-party pack is a reasonable choice.
Recommendations by body
- EOS R5 / R6 / R6 Mark II / R7: prefer the LP-E6NH. These bodies draw heavily and shoot a lot of video, so discharge stability directly affects whether a recording continues.
- 5D Mark IV / 6D Mark II / 90D: LP-E6NH as primary, LP-E6+ as backup. Recognition demands are moderate and most third-party packs work.
- 5D Mark II / 5D Mark III / 6D / 7D / 60D / 70D / 80D: an LP-E6+ is entirely adequate as a backup, though Canon is still preferable in the primary slot, especially on a fast body like the 7D Mark II. The original specifications for these bodies are in LP-E6 baseline models.
- EOS R5 Mark II: neither is optimal; choose the LP-E6P, as described in the compatibility notes in the LP-E6P category.
If your bodies span generations — a 5D Mark III and an R6, say — the least troublesome approach is to standardize on the LP-E6NH so one pack serves both, rather than maintaining two battery systems. An LP-E6+ from a brand like YO is better suited to being the third or fourth redundant pack than to replacing the primary.
FAQ
Is LP-E6+ part of Canon’s product line?
No. Canon has only LP-E6, LP-E6N, LP-E6NH and LP-E6P. LP-E6+ is a third-party label for an enhanced version, and specifications differ between brands, so they cannot be compared as if they were one model.
If an LP-E6+ rates higher than Canon, will it run longer?
Not necessarily. The rating is an ideal-condition figure, while real runtime depends on internal resistance, discharge curve and temperature. Under heavy load, a pack with higher resistance may actually sag sooner.
Can the two be mixed?
Yes, the body will not be damaged. But group and mark them by capacity and age, and prefer Canon for critical sessions so you are not relying on a pack of unknown condition at an important moment.
Is an LP-E6+ with a USB-C port worth buying?
If you travel and shoot for days, or often face a shortage of outlets, that feature is genuinely useful. Confirm the charging wattage and whether it supports use while charging, and accept that an extra port is an extra failure point.